![]() His method of attack was an Archimedean summation of areas he found the volumes and centers of gravity of bodies of rotation, cylindrical ungulae, and curvilinearly defined wedges by indirect proofs. Lalouvère’s chief book is the Quadratura circuli, published in 1651, in which he drew upon the work of Charles de La Faille, Guldin, and Vincentio. That Lalouvère was on friendly terms with Fermat is evident in a series of letters he further maintained a close relationship with Pardies in France and Wallis in England. The general of the order was at that time Guldin, a mathematician who may be considered, along with Cavalieri, Fermat, Vincentio, Kepler, Torricelli, Valerio - and indeed, Lalouvère - one of the precursors of modern integral calculus. Lalouvère served as a professor of humanities, rhetoric, Hebrew, theology, and mathematics. After completing his religious training, he was ordained a priest in 1631 or 1632. On July 9, 1620, at the age of 20, Lalouvère entered the Society of Jesus in Toulouse. He is also known for his incorrect solution of Pascal's problems on the cycloid.Īntoine de Lalouvère was born on August 24, 1600, in Rieux, Haute-Garonne, France, in an aristocratic family. Petau may be found in the latter’s Petavii orationes the same work contains Petau’s refutation of Lalouvère’s views on the astronomical questions of the horizon and calculation of the calendar.Īntoine de Lalouvère was a French mathematician known as the first scientist to study the properties of the helix. In addition to these publications, Lalouvère maintained an active correspondence on mathematical subjects, several of his letters to Pascal being extant. He returned to problems concerning cycloids - including those posed by Pascal - in 1660, in Veterum geometría promota in septem de cycloide libris. Having returned to mathematics, Lalouvère went on to deal with bodies in free fall and the inaccuracies of Gassendi’s observations in Propositiones geometricae sex (1658). A second, incomplete solution to Pascal’s problems was submitted by Wallis, and on November 25, 1658, the prize committee decided not to give the award to anyone. Pascal’s allegations were without foundation Lalouvère asserted that he had reached all his conclusions independently, and became embittered, while Fermat, who might have helped to resolve the quarrel, chose instead to remain neutral. The matter might have ended there had not Pascal, in his Histoire de la roulette, accused Lalouvère of plagiarizing his solutions from Roberval. ![]() The calculation of the volumes and centers of gravity of certain parts of cycloids and of the masses formed by their rotation around an axis was central to Pascal’s problems, however he did not accept Lalouvère’s solutions, and Lalouvère himself later discovered and corrected an error in computation. Lalouvère returned his solutions to Pascal’s first two problems only ten days later, having reached them by simple proportions rather than by calculation. Lalouvère’s interest was attracted by the nature of the problems, rather than by the prize, and Fermat transmitted them to him on July 11. The prize was to be sixty Spanish gold doubloons, and solutions to the problems he set were to be submitted by the following October 1. In June 1658, Pascal made his conclusions on cycloids the subject of open competition. Indeed, he stated that he preferred to go on to easier tasks, more suited “to my advanced age.” Nonetheless, he was drawn into the dispute with Pascal for which his name is best known. Thus, Lalouvère established the volume of the body of rotation and the center of gravity of its cross-section then by simple division, he found the volume of the cross-section.īy the time he published this work, Lalouvère was teaching Scholastic theology rather than mathematics and believed that he had reached his goals as a mathematician. He was then able to proceed by inverting Guldin’s rule whereby the volume of a body of rotation is equal to the product of the generating figure and the path of its center of gravity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |